Current View: All Antweb
Change View
Cite this page

Citing AntWeb

X

To cite this page, please use the following:

· For print: . Accessed

· For web:


Species: Polyergus bicolor   Wasmann, 1901 

Classification:
Download Data

Taxonomic History (provided by Barry Bolton, 2020)

Polyergus rufescens subsp. bicolor Wasmann, 1901 PDF: 369 (w.q.m.) U.S.A. Nearctic. Primary type information: USA,WISCONSIN Crawford Co., Prairie du Chien. AntCat AntWiki HOL

Taxonomic history

Junior synonym of Polyergus breviceps: Wheeler, 1968 PDF: 163.
Revived from synonymy and raised to species: Trager, 2013 PDF: 514.
Part of material of the unavailable name Polyergus rufescens breviceps fusciventris referred here by Trager, 2013 PDF: 514.
Part of the type material of the name Polyergus breviceps referred here by Trager, 2013 PDF: 514.

Overview:

Polyergus bicolor is usually easily distinguished from other Nearctic species by its distribution, distinctive two-tone coloring and sparse pilosity. This species lives in rotting logs, possibly preferring pine, with its host Formica subaenescens (Trager, 2013).

Distribution:

  Geographic regions (According to curated Geolocale/Taxon lists):
    Americas: Canada, United States
  Biogeographic regions (According to curated Bioregion/Taxon lists):
    Nearctic

Distribution Notes:

This species is apparently endemic to the upper Mississippi Valley, from the western Great Lakes region west to the Dakotas and southern Manitoba. In the past it was found in southern Wisconsin and as far south as Rockford, Illinois, but it has not been seen in this area in recent decades (Trager, 2013).

Biology:

Trager (2013): "P. bicolor normally parasitizes Formica subaenescens, and normally nests with it in rotten stumps or fallen limbs in forests. Wheeler (1910) described raids occurring in early afternoon in a mature mesic forest in northern Illinois that originated from nests in stumps. Two samples examined in this study had Formica neorufibarbis hosts, also a denizen of moist woods, especially tamarack bogs in the eastern part of its range. Through the course of this study I was not able to obtain or study any specimens of bicolor (nor of its host F. subaenescens) collected within about the last 50 years, from bicolor’s historic range, and I am led to wonder if they have contracted northward due to climatic warming or other causes. Just before submitting this manuscript, in July 2013, I collected a sample in northern Wisconsin. As in the published records, this sample occupied a rotting log with F. subaenescens. The log was about 35 cm in diameter, with bark beginning to loosen and wood in transition from white to red rot. At first glance, the mixed colony bore a striking resemblance to a young colony of the locally common Formica aserva".

Identification:

Trager (2013):"Worker description: Head subquadrate to suborbicular, its length and breadth about equal, sides often quite rounded; vertex concave, the concavity about half the head width in breadth, completely lacking vertex pilosity; scapes short, not reaching vertex corners, notably clavate in the apical third; pronotum lacking pilosity, or rarely with 1–2 dorsal erect setae; mesonotum profile flat or very weakly convex for most of its length; propodeum profile a rounded weakly obtuse angle; petiole with rounded sides, petiolar dorsum rounded, not at all or only feebly emarginate; first tergite moderately pubescent, with pilosity much like that of breviceps, in 4–5 transverse arrays; first tergite pilosity flexuous, subdecumbent.

Head matte; mesonotum matte; gaster matte to weakly shining.Color of head, mesonotum and often petiole dull red, gaster very dusky red (nearly black); forelegs often redder than middle and hind legs; pilosity reddish brown, pubescence fine and grayish".

Comments:

Trager (2013): "Northern (North Dakota, USA to British Columbia, Canada) populations of Polyergus mexicanus may exhibit similar coloration, but mexicanus is always more pilose. Bicoloration and reduced pilosity occur commonly in the small workers from young colonies of mexicanus, causing possible confusion. Nanitics of mexicanus are usually recognizable by their slender heads with a rounded vertex and longish appendages, and at least a pair of erect pronotal setae. Large workers of other breviceps-complex species also may appear somewhat bicolored, but only rarely is the bicoloration so neatly defined by a nearly completely dark gaster as in bicolor, and these others have more pilosity on the head and mesosoma".

References:

Trager, J.C. 2013. Global revision of the dulotic ant genus Polyergus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Formicinae, Formicini). Zootaxa 3722, 501–548.

Specimen Habitat Summary

Type specimens: not part of type series: casent0179561; syntype of Polyergus rufescens bicolor: casent0915627; type of Polyergus rufescens subsp. bicolor: focol2966



See something amiss? Send us an email.