Current View: All Antweb
Change View
Cite this page

Citing AntWeb

X

To cite this page, please use the following:

· For print:      Citation: AntWeb. Version 8.63.2. California Academy of Science, online at https://www.antweb.org. Accessed .

· For web:


Species: Camponotus (Myrmentoma) piceus   (Leach, 1825) 

Classification:
Download Data

See Also:

Camponotus piceus_cf_sp01

Taxonomic History (provided by Barry Bolton, 2021)

Formica picea Leach, 1825 PDF: 292 (w.q.m.) FRANCE. Palearctic. Primary type information: Seifert, 2019b 10.25674/so-91-1-02 PDF: neotype (w.): FRA: 43.799°N, 7.488°N, 90 m / Menton – 2.8 km N / leg. C. Galkowski 2011.08.10’ and ‘Neotype (top) / Camponotus piceus (Leach 1825) / des. B. Seifert 2018’. (SMNG) AntCat AntWiki HOL

Taxonomic history

Combination in Camponotus: Roger, 1863b PDF: 1.
[Misspelled as picaea by Ruzsky, 1905b: 255.].
Junior synonym of Camponotus lateralis: Roger, 1859 PDF: 231; Mayr, 1863a PDF: 399; Roger, 1863b PDF: 1; Forel, 1874 PDF: 96 (in list); Emery & Forel, 1879 PDF: 448.
Status as species: Emery, 1925e PDF: 67; Santschi, 1926f PDF: 288; Finzi, 1927b PDF: 52 (in key); Karavaiev, 1927a PDF: 295; Karavaiev, 1927d: 277 (in key); Finzi, 1930d PDF: 318; Santschi, 1931a: 12; Finzi, 1933 PDF: 165; Grandi, 1935 PDF: 102; Zimmermann, 1935 PDF: 58; Karavaiev, 1936: 190; Röszler, 1942a PDF: 52; Röszler, 1951: 90; Consani & Zangheri, 1952 PDF: 43; Baroni Urbani, 1964b PDF: 58; Baroni Urbani, 1964c PDF: 162; Kutter, 1968b PDF: 60; Cagniant, 1970c PDF: 37; Baroni Urbani, 1971c PDF: 193; Collingwood, 1971 PDF: 164; Baroni Urbani, 1974a PDF: 237; Pisarski, 1975: 32; Hamann & Klemm, 1976 PDF: 677; Kutter, 1977c: 207; Collingwood, 1978 PDF: 91 (in key); Agosti & Collingwood, 1987a PDF: 59; Agosti & Collingwood, 1987b PDF: 283 (in key); Le Moli & Rosi, 1991: 35; Atanassov & Dlussky, 1992: 222; Arakelian, 1994 PDF: 87; Bolton, 1995b: 117; Poldi et al., 1995: 7; Radchenko, 1996e: 1198 (in key); Espadaler, 1997g PDF: 27; Radchenko, 1997c: 706; Collingwood & Prince, 1998: 24 (in key); Gallé et al., 1998: 216; Czechowski et al., 2002 PDF: 99; Karaman & Karaman, 2003 PDF: 47; Csosz & Markó, 2005 PDF: 229; Karaman & Karaman, 2005 PDF: 58; Bračko, 2006 PDF: 146; Markó et al., 2006 PDF: 66; Petrov, 2006 PDF: 71, 108 (in key); Bračko, 2007 PDF: 19; Radchenko, 2007 PDF: 37; Seifert, 2007: 270; Werner & Wiezik, 2007 PDF: 143; Zryanin & Zryanina, 2007 PDF: 233; Gratiashvili & Barjadze, 2008 PDF: 131; Casevitz-Weulersse & Galkowski, 2009 PDF: 480; Lapeva-Gjonova et al., 2010 PDF: 45; Boer, 2010: 20; Csosz et al., 2011 PDF: 58; Karaman et al., 2011 PDF: 189; Karaman, 2011b PDF: 72; Legakis, 2011 PDF: 32; Ran & Zhou, 2011: 69; Borowiec & Salata, 2012 PDF: 480; Czechowski et al., 2012: 249; Guénard & Dunn, 2012 PDF: 29; Kiran & Karaman, 2012 PDF: 7; Nezhad et al., 2012 PDF: 66; Karaman & Aktaç, 2013 PDF: 50 (in key); Borowiec, 2014 PDF: 39; Bračko et al., 2014 PDF: 18; Lebas et al., 2016: 140; Radchenko, 2016: 334; Seifert, 2018: 264; Seifert, 2019b 10.25674/so-91-1-02 PDF: 25.
Material of the unavailable name Camponotus piceus spissinodis dusmeti: referred here by Seifert, 2019b 10.25674/so-91-1-02 PDF: 28.
// Distribution

Distribution:

  Geographic regions (According to curated Geolocale/Taxon lists):
    Africa: Algeria
    Asia: Armenia, China, Georgia, Turkey
    Europe: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Balearic Islands, Czech Republic, Germany, Gibraltar, Hungary, Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Switzerland, Ukraine
  Biogeographic regions (According to curated Bioregion/Taxon lists):
    Palearctic

Distribution Notes:

Centr. & S SLO, mostly in Submediterranean

Biology:

Xerothermous open habitats

Specimen Habitat Summary

Found most commonly in these habitats: 7 times found in deciduous forest, 3 times found in mountain deciduous forest, 2 times found in rocky grassland, 3 times found in garden, 2 times found in old olive tree plantation, 2 times found in Maquis (natural), 2 times found in burned maquis shrubland, 2 times found in pine forest, 2 times found in Encinar (Dehesa), 1 times found in Encinar aclarado, ...

Found most commonly in these microhabitats: 24 times under stone, 4 times nbp, 3 times on shrubs, 2 times Sobre encina, 2 times on tree, 2 times on ground, 2 times on grass, 1 times on Citrus, 1 times Foraging on trees, 2 times Foraging, 1 times Turbera, ...

Collected most commonly using these methods: 15 times Hand, 16 times search, 1 times by hand, 1 times pitfall.

Elevations: collected from 2 - 1952 meters, 445 meters average

Collect Date Range: collected between 1912-08-24 and 2020-08-13

Type specimens: Lectotype of Formica foveolata: casent0915597; neotype of Camponotus piceus: antweb1041244; syntype of Camponotus lateralis ebneri: casent0915596; syntype of Camponotus kiesenwetteri nitidescens: casent0910437, casent0910438; syntype of Camponotus lateralis piceus figaro: casent0905390



See something amiss? Send us an email.