1 subspecies
Taxonomic history
| Forel, 1906d PDF: 246 (m.); Luederwaldt, 1918 PDF: 54 (q.). |
| Combination in Labidus (Labidus): Bruch, 1914 PDF: 215; in Labidus: Borgmeier, 1953 PDF: 16. |
| Senior synonym of Labidus tepeguas: Mayr, 1886b PDF: 118; Borgmeier, 1955 PDF: 103; of Labidus westwoodi: Emery, 1910b PDF: 23; Borgmeier, 1955 PDF: 103; of Labidus emiliae, Labidus guianense: Borgmeier, 1953 PDF: 10, 19. |
| , respectively; of Labidus ferruginea: Borgmeier, 1955 PDF: 103. |
| Current subspecies: nominal plus Labidus praedator sedulus. |
| See also: Gallardo, 1920 PDF: 333; Bruch, 1921 PDF: 181; Watkins, 1976: 8. |
Mexico to Argentina. Type locality Brazil. Costa Rica: wet forest areas throughout.
This is a widespread and common species throughout the Neotropics. In Costa Rica it can be locally abundant, but seems to be somewhat patchy. I have not encountered it in dry forest areas, but it does occur in both lowland and montane wet forest. On the Barva transect in Braulio Carrillo National Park, it is a relatively rare ant at La Selva but reaches much higher density at 1000-1500m elevation.
Labidus praedator forms massive carpet raids that blanket the ground. In some ways they can be more impressive than Eciton burchellii, because the workers are smaller and more dense, and the ground and low vegetation become almost entirely black with a seething mass of workers. They seem to be mainly subterranean, without surface bivouacs. The large surface raids always seem to emerge spontaneously from the leaf litter or from a hole in the ground. Small segments of columns may be encountered, emerging from one hole and entering another one a few meters away.
I have rarely observed the prey of L. praedator, so I do not know what their dietary preferences are. In one raid I observed a mass of workers harvesting pieces from a fruit on the forest floor, so they may have somewhat generalized scavenging habits, like L. coecus. In cloud forest habitats I have sometimes seen masses of terrestrial isopods rushing up low vegetation and forming clusters on leaf tips in response to a Labidus swarm in the leaf litter below, but I do not know if the Labidus actually prey on the isopods.
Males are occasionally attracted to lights at night, and may also be collected in Malaise traps.
Borgmeier (1955) recognized two subspecies: praedator s. str. and praedator sedulus (Menozzi 1926). The type locality of praedator s. str. is Brazil, of sedulus Colombia. The male of praedator s. str. had the frons relatively flat and the mandibles acuminate; the male of sedulus had the frons more elevated and the tip of the mandible obliquely truncate and somewhat emarginate (Figure). The soldier of praedator s. str. had the rear margin of the head more or less flat, not deeply emarginate; the soldier of sedulus had the rear margin deeply emarginate. The material examined by Borgmeier showed overlapping or interdigitated ranges. He identified workers of praedator s. str. from Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Guyana, throughout Brazil, Paraguay, and Argentina; and males from Mexico, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Argentina. For sedulus, he identified workers from Costa Rica, Panama, and Colombia; and males from Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, and Bolivia.
The males I have examined from Costa Rica have the emarginate mandibles of sedulus. The degree of emargination of the head of the soldier depends greatly on the size of the soldier, and I do not trust that character without a more quantitative assessment. Until variation is investigated more thoroughly, I prefer to refer to the Costa Rican material as praedator s. str. and to ignore sedulus until it is better defined.
Borgmeier, T. 1955. Die Wanderameisen der neotropischen Region. Studia Entomologica 3:1-720.
Found most commonly in these habitats: 62 times found in montane wet forest, 8 times found in cloud forest, 9 times found in 2º mesophil forest, 2 times found in lowland rainforest, 1 times found in wet oak forest, 5 times found in wet forest, 1 times found in road in pasture, 3 times found in mature wet forest, 3 times found in mesophil forest, 1 times found in montane rainforest, ...
Collected most commonly using these methods or in the following microhabitats: 1 times in foraging column, 27 times search, 36 times Malaise, 11 times flight intercept trap, 9 times MiniWinkler, 4 times Berlese, 6 times Blacklight, 2 times light trap, 4 times pan trap, 3 times Pitfall, 3 times Sweeping, ...
Elevations: collected from 40 - 2260 meters, 1088 meters average
CASENT0106227
CASENT0173515
CASENT0173516
CASENT0173596
CASENT0178608
CASENT0249466
CASENT0249467
CASENT0902656
CASENT0902657
CASENT0902658
INBIOCRI001283625