Welcome to the new AntWeb!

We here at AntWeb have been busy working on our newest (and most ambitious) version of the site - and there are lots of great new things! Which means there are lots of changes (don't worry, they're all for the best).

And we've put together a handy little guide to show you all the new features and enhancements - why don't you have a quick look to check out all the new features and enhancements?

No thanks
Current View: Global: All Antweb
Change View
Cite this page

Citing AntWeb


To cite this page, please use the following:

· For print: . Accessed

· For web:

Species: Cerapachys (typhlus) biroi

Download Data

Taxonomic History (provided by Barry Bolton, 2014)

Cerapachys (Syscia) biroi Forel, 1907d PDF: 7 (w.) SINGAPORE. Indomalaya. AntCat AntWiki

Taxonomic history

Imai, et al. 1984: 5 (k.).
See also: Ogata, 1983b PDF: 136.


Cerapachys biroi is a small (2–3 mm) blind subterranean ant with short antennal scapes, a distinctly two-segmented waist, a powerful sting, and a cylindrical body armored with thick cuticle. The species is very inconspicuous owing to its hypogaeic foraging, and is rarely collected. It believed to be native to Asia (Brown, 1975; Wetterer et al., 2012), where it is widely spread from Nepal, India and China to South East Asia, and has established introduced populations throughout the Pacific Islands (where it was referred to by its junior synonym C. silvestrii) and the West Indies. Outside Asia, all records of C. biroi come from islands, possibly due to reduced competition with dominant ants in island habitats (Wetterer et al., 2012). It is also the only known species within the Cerapachyinae to successfully establish populations outside its native range. The introduced populations are not known to have any adverse impacts on agricultural systems or human health. The general biology and worldwide distribution was profiled by Wetterer et al. (2012). 


Native range. Widely spread through Asia, from Nepal, India and China to South East Asia.
Introduced range: Pacific Islands and West Indies.

Hawaii: Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, Maui and Hawaii


Like many of its congeners, C. biroi maintains colonies of up to several hundred workers that raid the brood of other ant species for food (Tsuji & Yamauchi, 1995), but will occasionally take the soft-bodied larvae of other insects (Wolcott, 1951 (1948)). The heavily sclerotized cuticle provides excellent protection against injury and dismemberment during prey raids, and the venomous sting is used to immobilize opponents (Hölldobler, 1982). The species alternates stationary and nomadic phases that are synchronized with the production of distinct brood cohorts (Ravary et al., 2006; Ravary & Jaisson, 2002). Cerapachys biroi belongs to a very small number of ant species known to reproduce through thelytokous parthenogenesis (Heinze, 2008; Ravary & Jaisson, 2004; Tsuji & Yamauchi, 1995). It has been proposed that this ability of workers to produce diploid eggs has facilitated the ability of C. biroi to establish new populations across the world (Yamauchi & Ogata, 1995). The ability of researchers to maintain colonies of C. biroi in laboratory settings (Ravary et al., 2007)also hint at its capacity as a successful tramp species. 


Diagnosis among workers of introduced and commonly intercepted ants in the United States. Antenna 9-segmented. Antennal insertions entirely exposed, not covered even partially by frontal lobes. Antennal scapes conspicuously short; barely surpassing eye level. Eyes minute to absent (equal to or less than 3 facets). Waist 2-segmented. Petiole narrowly attached to gaster and with conspicuous posterior face. Gaster armed with sting. Pygidium flattened and armed with a row of small peg-like teeth. Body cylindrically shaped. 

Cerapachys biroi is distinguished from all other introduced ants by the following characters: (1) waist with two segments; (2) eyes absent or reduced to a single ommatidia; (3) antennal insertions entirely exposed, not covered even partially by frontal lobes; (4) antennal scapes conspicuously short and barely surpassing eye level; (5) pygidium flattened and armed with a row of small peg-like teeth.


Brown, W.L., Jr. (1975) Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. V. Ponerinae, tribes Platythyreini, Cerapachyini, Cylindromyrmecini, Acanthostichini, and Aenictogitini. Search Agric. (Ithaca, N. Y.), 5(1), 1-115.

Hölldobler, B. (1982) Communication, raiding behavior and prey storage in Cerapachys (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche, 89, 3-23.

Ravary, F., Jahyny, B. & Jaisson, P. (2006) Brood stimulation controls the phasic reproductive cycle of the parthenogenetic ant Cerapachys biroi. Insect. Soc., 53, 20-26.

Ravary, F. & Jaisson, P. (2002) The reproductive cycle of thelytokous colonies of Cerapachys biroi Forel (Formicidae, Cerapachyinae). Insect. Soc., 49, 114-119.

Ravary, F., Lecoutey, E., Kaminski, G., Châline, N. & Jaisson, P. (2007) Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr. Biol., 17, 1308-1312.

Tsuji, K. & Yamauchi, K. (1995) Production of females by parthenogenesis in the ant Cerapachys biroi. Insect. Soc., 42, 333-336.

Wetterer, J.K., Kronauer, D.J.C. & Borowiec, M.L. (2012) Worldwide spread of Cerapachys biroi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Cerapachyinae). Myrmecol. News, 17, 1-4.

Wolcott, G.N. (1951 (1948)) The insects of Puerto Rico. Hymenoptera. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico, 32, 749-975 [Formicidae p. 810-839].

Yamauchi, K. & Ogata, K. (1995) Social structure and reproductive systems of tramp versus endemic ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Ryukyu Islands. Pac. Sci., 49, 55-68.

Taxon Page Author History

On 2012-06-14 14:48:41 Eli Sarnat modified Distribution
On 2012-06-14 14:48:01 Eli Sarnat modified Biology
On 2012-06-14 14:47:38 Eli Sarnat modified Identification
On 2012-06-14 14:46:35 Eli Sarnat modified Biology
On 2012-06-14 14:46:04 Eli Sarnat modified References
On 2012-06-14 14:43:34 Eli Sarnat modified Distribution
On 2012-06-14 14:42:59 Eli Sarnat modified Overview
On 2011-03-31 23:46:13 Eli Sarnat modified Distribution

Specimen Habitat Summary

Found most commonly in these habitats: 12 times found in rainforest, 8 times found in mixed forest, 2 times found in dry forest, 5 times found in forest, 4 times found in littoral rainforest, 3 times found in native forest, 1 times found in littoral forest, 1 times found in Lowland coastal, coraline island, 1 times found in non native forest, 1 times found in coastal scrub, ...

Collected most commonly using these methods or in the following microhabitats: 11 times 9 MaxiWinks, mixed samples, 1 times 2 Maxi Winks, 1 times 4 MaxiWinks, mixed samples, 3 times Winkler, 3 times beating low vegetation, 1 times MW 25 sample transect, 5m, 2 times Pitfall trap, 1 times 3 MaxiWinks, mixed samples, 1 times 6 MaxiWinks, mixed samples, 1 times 9 maxi winks, 1 times Malaise trap, ...

Elevations: collected from 5 - 520 meters, 159 meters average

Type specimens: paralectotype of Cerapachys biroi: casent0907059

(-1 examples)

See something amiss? Send us an email.
Enlarge Map