To cite this page, please use the following:
· For print: . Accessed
· For web:
|[Also described as new by Emery, 1895n: 65. Unjustified emendation of spelling to Hypoponera ragusae: Emery, 1911e PDF: 91.].|
|Santschi, 1907 PDF: 313 (w.q.,ergatoid q.,ergatoid m.); Santschi, 1908 PDF: 519 (m.); Emery, 1916a PDF: 109 (q.).|
|Senior synonym of Hypoponera gyptis, Hypoponera lesnei, Hypoponera massiliensis, Hypoponera parva: Bernard, 1967a PDF: 88; of Hypoponera aethiopica, Hypoponera decipiens, Hypoponera formosae, Hypoponera gleadowi, Hypoponera oblongiceps, Hypoponera santschii: Bolton & Fisher, 2011 PDF: 94.|
Hypoponera ragusai is a relatively nondescript small, shining brownish yellow to brown species with short antennal scapes and minute but conspicuous eyes. The species has often been referred to in the literature by its junior synonyms H. decipiens (Forel) and H. gleadowi (Forel), and has also been regularly misidentified as H. punctatissima (Bolton & Fisher, 2011). The native range of H. ragusai is in the Old World, and is conjectured to be of African origin (Wilson & Taylor, 1967). The current confirmed distribution includes Europe, Africa and India, though the actual distribution may be much wider. Like its close relative H. punctatissima, workers of the species are rarely collected and are likely restricted to the cryptobiotic subterranean and leaf litter habitats. It is likely that both species share a similar natural history. Taylor (1967)suggested that the production of ergatoid males by both H. punctatissima and its close relative H. ragusai (as H. gleadowi) may be related to their success as tramp species through some kind of simplification of nuptial activity. Although H. ragusai nor its synonyms are generally reported as a nuisance species, its pest status may require reevaluation in conjunction with its taxonomic status for material not examined by Bolton & Fisher (2011).
Native range. Likely Africa. Algeria, Italy, France, Tunisia, Egypt, Ethiopia, Israel, Kenya, India.
Introduced range. USA: Hawaiian Is., Maryland. Japan, Taiwan, New Caledonia.
Unconfirmed range. Seychelles, Saudi Arabia, Korean Peninsula.
The worldwide distribution of H. ragusai will remain uncertain until material of the H. punctatissima group is reexamined according to the taxonomic changes and identification suggestions prescribed in Bolton & Fisher (2011). For example, H. gleadowi was reported as occurring in India, the Korean Peninsula, Japan, Taiwan, Hawaii and the continental U.S.A. (Imai et al., 2003), but the specimens should be checked against H. punctatissima before the distribution is confirmed. Wilson & Taylor (1967) treated H. decipiens as a junior synonym of H. punctatissima, and the material they assigned to the latter species from across the Pacific must also be reexamined to determine whether any of it belongs to H. ragusai (as does the Hawaii material (Onoyama, 1989)). The species is not believed to occur in Fiji (Sarnat & Economo, In Press). The records from Seychelles (Dorow, 1996), Saudi Arabia (Collingwood & Agosti, 1996)also await confirmation (Bolton & Fisher, 2011). Although not examined by Bolton & Fisher (2011), Ponera gyptis Santschi (syntypes from Maryland, USA) was synonymized with H. gleadowi (Taylor, 1967) and subsequently with H. ragusai by the previous authors.
Among introduced and commonly intercepted ants of the United States, H. ragusai is most likely to be confused with H. opaciceps and H. punctatissima. It can be reliably distinguished from the former by the antennal scapes which fail to reach the posterior head margin (versus reach and slightly exceed the posterior head margin), the more smooth and shining sculpture (especially the mesopleuron region), and the relatively shorter and broader petiole with the anterior and posterior faces slightly converging apically. It can be separated from H. punctatissima by (1) the petiolar node, which in profile is relatively longer and shorter (LPeI 55–61 versus 43–53 in H. punctatissima); and (2) in dorsal view the petiolar node is relatively shorter from front to back (DPeI 120–140 versus 140–165 in H. punctatissima). According to Bolton & Fisher (2011), in addition to differences in the shape of the petiolar node, H. ragusai workers are always yellow to light brownish yellow, fall at the bottom end of the known size range of H. punctatissima (e.g. HW 0.42–0.50, versus 0.46– 0.60 in H. punctatissima) and have heads that average relatively slightly narrower and scapes that are relatively slightly longer than in H. punctatissima; compare CI and SI above with CI 79–87 and SI 75–84 in H. punctatissima. Finally, the queen of H. ragusai is considerably darker in color than her workers, whereas in H. punctatissima the two castes have the same color.
Bolton, B. & Fisher, B.L. (2011) Taxonomy of Afrotropical and West Palaearctic ants of the ponerine genus Hypoponera Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa, 2843, 1-118.
Collingwood, C.A. & Agosti, D. (1996) Formicidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) of Saudi Arabia (Part 2). Fauna Saudi Arabia, 15, 300-385.
Collingwood, C.A. & van Harten, A. (2001) Additions to the ant fauna of Yemen. Buchr. Entomol., 8, 559-568.
Dorow, W.H.O. (1996) Review and bibliography of the ants of the Seychelles (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Afr. Zool., 110, 73-96.
Espadaler, X. (2007) The ants of El Hierro (Canary Islands). In: Snelling, R.R., Fisher, B.L. & Ward, P.S. (Eds.) Advances in ant systematics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): homage to E. O. Wilson - 50 years of contributions. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, vol. 80, Gainesville, FL, 690 p., pp. 113-127.
Imai, H.T., Kihara, A., Kondoh, M., Kubota, M., Kuribayashi, S., Ogata, K., Onoyama, K., Taylor, R.W., Terayama, M., Tsukii, Y., Yoshimura, M. & Ugava, Y. (2003) Ants of Japan. Gakken, Tokyo, 224 pp.
Mühlenberg, M., Leipold, D., Mader, H.J. & Steinhauer, B. (1977) Island ecology of arthropods. II. Niches and relative abundances of Seychelles ants (Formicidae) in different habitats. Oecologia, 29, 135-144.
Onoyama, K. (1989) Notes on the ants of the genus Hypoponera in Japan (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Edaphologia, 41, 1-10.
Taylor, R.W. (1967) A monographic revision of the ant genus Ponera Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pac. Insects Monogr., 13, 1-112.
Tinaut, A. (2001) Hypoponera ragusai (Emery, 1895) a cavernicolous ant new for the Iberian Peninsula (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Graellsia, 57, 3-8.
Wilson, E.O. & Taylor, R.W. (1967) The ants of Polynesia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pac. Insects Monogr., 14, 1-109.
|Hypoponera ragusai||Bolton, B. & Fisher, B. L., 2011, Taxonomy of Afrotropical and West Palaearctic ants of the ponerine genus Hypoponera Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)., Zootaxa 2843, pp. 1-118: 94-97, (download)||94-97||23490|
|Hypoponera ragusai||Espadaler, X., 2007, The ants of El Hierro (Canary Islands)., Advances in ant systematics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Homage to E. O. Wilson - 50 years of contributions., Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 80, pp. 113-127: 117, (download)||117||21278|
Found most commonly in these habitats: 1 times found in anthropogenic, 1 times found in Campo de Labranza, 1 times found in rainforest.
Found most commonly in these microhabitats: 1 times sous les pierres, 1 times playground, 1 times Nido entre raices de Higuera, 1 times ex rotten log.
Collected most commonly using these methods: 2 times Hand, 1 times search.
Elevations: collected from 5 - 1889 meters, 642 meters average
Type specimens: cotype: casent0103117; Holotype of Ponera lesnei: casent0915493; syntype of Ponera gleadowi: casent0902562, casent0907310; syntype of Ponera gleadowi aethiopica: casent0907312; syntype of Ponera gleadowi decipiens: casent0902563; syntype of Ponera gleadowii decipiens: casent0907313; syntype of Ponera japonica formosae: casent0907314; syntype of Ponera oblongiceps: casent0902564; syntype of Ponera ragusai santschii: casent0903907; type of Ponera gleadowi decipiens var. sauteri: focol0362, focol0363; type of Ponera japonica. r. formosae: focol0361